
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
You are
here: >orientation>change
In one way
or another, most Historic Environment bodies are concerned with managing
change. This can be though legal designations, through the planning system, or
by working with others to ensure that we pass on what is important so that
people in the future can benefit from it too. On the whole there are good
systems in place which are meant to ensure that this happens: in practice,
however, we know we are losing buildings, gardens, monuments and landscapes,
and that other places are suffering from more gradual changes that will
ultimately lead to their destruction. The trouble is that most of our knowledge
is anecdotal; we don’t have the essential statistics that should be
ringing warning bells. We need to understand change in a wider context.
Various
laws exist to help identify and protect the most important parts of our
heritage of archaeological sites, historic buildings and townscapes, but there
are many flaws in the legislation that too often mean that the laws are not
working. Planning rules are also there to make sure that historic features are
treated sensitively when threatened by developments, but all too often the
guidance published by the Scottish Executive is not heeded, and places that are
important to local people are permanently damaged or destroyed. And when it
comes to our best historic gardens and designed landscapes, our wider historic
landscapes, and even our iconic battlefields, there is little to protect them
from unsustainable change. Scottish Ministers recognise that this needs to be
looked into, but will the Scottish Executive take up the challenge and
undertake a wide-ranging review of the successes and failures of designations,
leading to improvements in the law and how it is applied?
Click HERE for more information
about designated historic places and planning matters
We are
constantly reassured that ‘sustainable development is at the heart of the
work of the Scottish Executive’, but is this commitment being followed
through on the ground in relation to the Historic Environment? The 2002 report Passed to the
Future seemed to be saying all the right things, but too little has
been happening since, and a review of progress is overdue. A wider look at
sustainable development initiatives in
Click HERE for details of sustainable
development and the Historic Environment
Many of the
problems we can identify in the Historic Environment shouldn’t be
happening. Systems are meant to be in place to ensure that government departments
talk to each other, that there is ‘cross-compliance’ between
Historic Environment regulations and those of other interests, and that there
is sufficient infrastructure to make things happen. None of these things are
working as they should, and there has been no clear champion for the Historic
Environment to draw attention to this and demand that things are improved.
Where things are working well – and there are abundant individual
examples of this – all too often only a few people get to hear about it
and share the benefits of good ideas. We need to look again at how we all
communicate, and to ensure that we have the infrastructure and capacity to
enable our systems to work.
Click HERE to look at issues of
communication, capacity and systems
NOTE: The issues and viewpoints contained within the HERT web
pages have been raised as part of the scoping process, but should not be taken
to represent the views of BEFS or its members.